![]() ![]() There are channels losing their videos to corporate giants, channels disappearing that leave their creators without a job and traditional celebrities creeping onto the platform at the expense of the personalities that built it. YouTube cracking down on this content is a great step forward in proper moderation, but there's still a lot of work that needs to be done. ![]() These videos are made solely for the clicks and can sometimes pull in tens of millions of impressionable viewers. Channels like PrankInvasion, JoeySalads, FouseyTube and others post "fake" pranks that younger viewers may feel are the real thing. Pranks that are "so bad they leave a child traumatized for life" might refer to the Daddy Of Five YouTube channel, where the family lost custody of two of their children because of the troublesome and abusive nature of their "prank" videos. "Home Invasion pranks," where content creators pretend to break into the homes of unsespecting victims, have been popular with family YouTube channels like the Ace Family and more risque content creators like Sam Pepper. This blog post also mentions a different pranks that refer to very specific instances. The Tide Pod challenge, where players attempted to eat an extremely poisonous sack of bleach because the internet told them to, was cited as one such challenge. They want to "prohibit content that causes serious harm" and limit the damage done to challenge participants. She says that some challenges like "Jimmy Kimmel's Terrible Christmas Presents prank or the water bottle flip challenge" are an important part of YouTube, but the site wants to make sure pranks don't step over the line. In a blog post from early on Wednesday, Camilla at Team YouTube goes into a bit more detail on these Community Guideline changes. "Challenges that present an apparent risk of death" and that "pose an imminent risk of injury or bodily harm" are all also not allowed on YouTube. Alien invasion prank : We teamed up to scare our friend :-) and it worked very well. ![]() This change comes after years of controversy surrounding the existence of prank channels and discussions about whether they should be allowed on the video streaming platform. The updated guidelines say that pranks " that lead victims to believe they are in physical danger or that can cause real physical harm" or "that may cause emotional distress to children" are no longer allowed on the platform. ![]() So many videos of pranks by customers have been posted online in Japan that the phenomenon is considered a social problem.On Tuesday night, YouTube announced major changes to its external Community Guidelines that target pranks and challenges. The prankster's representatives submitted a written submission to the court asking it to dismiss the complaint. The company says the prank offended many of its customers, and damaged their trust in its restaurant hygiene. It says it suffered a loss of more than 16 billion yen, or about 115 million dollars, as a result. The video shows a customer licking a soy sauce bottle in the chain's Gifu City restaurant in central Japan in January.Īkindo Sushiro says the video led to a significant drop in customers nationwide and a sharp decline in the share price of its parent company. It is seeking more than 67 million yen, or about 480,000 dollars, in damages. The Osaka-based company claims the video hurt its business and share price.Īkindo Sushiro filed the lawsuit with the Osaka District Court. The operator of a major Japanese conveyor-belt sushi chain is suing a customer for damages after he posted a prank video on social media. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |